Is this Syrian thing, coming to Congress for a vote of approval, is it all about backing Republicans into a corner and forcing them to increase the debt limit and lifting Sequestration in order to pay for this "strike?" That, of course, and Obama saving face after declaring a "red line."
Here's an interesting list from http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-03/why-did-obama-choose-syria compiled by J.P.Morgan Asset Management:
If Obama hasn't sent the weapons he promised, why don't we try that before tossing rockets? Besides, now we don't even know where Assad has moved the targets to. Give the weapons to the rebels and let them deal with it on their own. How about that? (Uh, tell me again who makes up the "rebels.)
Ah-ha! Obama is coming to Congress because America "striking" Syria is against international law!! and the United Nations has publicly said so. AGAIN Obama ignores the rule of law (even if it is a UN law...), and he, on behalf of America, is encouraging other countries to do the same.
Any comments will come to me privately. If they add to the conversation - whether I agree with them or not - I will post them. If they are full of discord and wrath or are not grounded in sound facts, I will NOT post them. It's my blog. Be civil or be quiet. I love a good political conversation; I abhor tactless arguments. I admire folks who can talk politics - or religion - and remain respectful.
I also invite you to my other blog, TheTravelersTwo.blogspot.com, for a break from politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comments will come to me privately. If they add to the conversation - whether I agree with them or not - I will post them. If they are full of discord and wrath or are not grounded in sound facts, I will NOT post them. It's my blog. Be civil or be quiet. I love a good political conversation; I abhor tactless arguments. I admire folks who can talk politics - or religion - and remain respectful. Check back later to see if your comment is posted. I may need time to verify facts. Thank you.